Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money Back

Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money... by jjeaff on Monday March 05, 2018 @08:39PM (#16526225)

Why would having strings attached necessarily reduce the generosity?

If I gift you a new car, but with the caveat that after 5 years, you must donate it to charity, does that make my gift disingenous or not generous?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money... by IntronExon on Monday March 05, 2018 @08:57PM (#16526303)

It certainly changes it, although I’d be far more likely to compare this case with you giving me a car with instructions telling me to pick certain people up and drop them off at certain times, or you’ll take the car back.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money... by jjeaff on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @02:51AM (#16527531)

You have the option to take the car with those caveats or not. If you choose to accept it, I must conclude that you consider it a net positive and thus a gift. Not as good as a full, unfettered gift, but a gift nonetheless.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money... by benchaney on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @03:12AM (#16527603)

> I must conclude that you consider it a net positive and thus a gift

By this definition, whenever anyone buys anything it is a gift.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money... by jjeaff on Monday March 12, 2018 @03:05PM (#16570499)

You should re-read my comment then.

[ Parent | on HN ]