News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Here Come the Fake Videos, Too by Steve44 on Monday March 05, 2018 @04:36AM (#16519858)
Nikon used to provide "Image Authentication Software" which would authenticate images and show if they had been altered since taken by the camera. This was useful not only in news but also court cases.

This, obviously, could not be used on tweaked published images but would work if you had access to the original frame. Most photojournalists work to a code whereby they don't amend the images at all, even tidying up, but that's only viable if they and their editors are trustworthy.

The Nikon process was cracked a few years ago. This allowed edited images to pass the validation.

Re:Here Come the Fake Videos, Too by murph-almighty on Monday March 05, 2018 @09:52AM (#16521378)
I'm actually really curious about this now. Couldn't we just hash the photo and compare the file to the signature to verify authenticity?
Re:Here Come the Fake Videos, Too by Steve44 on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @07:28AM (#16535909)
Yes, but at what point do you hash it? The Nikon software proved it was unaltered since the shutter press, anything after that would rely on it not being touched until the hash was generated.