Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in Europe

Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E... by the_mitsuhiko on Monday March 05, 2018 @04:12AM (#16519745)

> The jurisdiction stuff is disturbing. Having separate rules/rulings for Belgium, Turkey, Venezuela, etc... It's (a) not practical and will end up helping incumbents

I don’t think so. Only really large corporations are able to serve all areas anyways. Most small companies in the world already cannot afford to serve multiple jurisdictions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E... by dbajakkchs on Monday March 05, 2018 @04:16AM (#16519768)

Isn’t serving multiple jurisdictions the default online? You have to go out of your way to treat them differently.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E... by SentientNo4 on Monday March 05, 2018 @04:25AM (#16519806)

If you run a blog, yes, the global nature of Internet ensures that. If you're running a business, you must abide the law of every jurisdiction you operate in. Companies invest lots of money and effort doing this, from operational (having a physical presence in each region) to technical (e.g. how Amazon has separate sites for each region).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E... by dalbasal on Monday March 05, 2018 @04:30AM (#16519828)

I disagree. The internet changes this, internationalizes a lot. Also, thinking of this as "companies serving markets" is (imo) a bad frame.

HN is serving all countries right now, as it did when there were 54 people reading it the day it launched.

Geographic borders may be relevant online, but they may not.

[ Parent | on HN ]