Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E...
by PeterStuer on Monday March 05, 2018 @01:28AM
(#16519161)
That could work if:
- it was on by default. You shouldn't have to 'opt-out' of invasive surveillance.
- it was enforceable and backed by a vigilant regulator and credibly enforced legal deterrents. We're far beyond a 'pinky-promise' being enough.
Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E...
by simion314 on Monday March 05, 2018 @08:03AM
(#16520727)
>- it was on by default. You shouldn't have to 'opt-out' of invasive surveillance.
Conmppanies did not liked when IE did this but I think the solution would be simple, when you start the browser for the first time you will be asked if you want to get tracked or not, you will have 2 big buttons to chose.
Then FB. Google and others should ask the users to switch this because they want to track you on a different website and explain to the users why.
Re:Facebook’s tracking of non-users ruled illegal again in E...
by kerng on Sunday March 04, 2018 @11:26PM
(#16518714)
Yeah, I found it very disingenuous back then from Google to push against this. It could be a widely accepted standard by now, and it makes a lot of sense. Unfortunately, as long as companies like big players as Facebook and Google ignore it, it won't succeed.
Someone should invent a http header that lets you signal that you don't want to be tracked. It could be named something like DNT, for do-not-track. People could then set DNT=1 and websites such as Facebook would know not to track you...