DNA nanobot 'starves' tumors

Re:DNA nanobot 'starves' tumors by tyingq on Sunday March 04, 2018 @09:31AM (#16514815)

I agree, though sitting and talking with breast cancer patients waiting on the radiation machine or infusion room...it's so clearly physically barbaric. Especially those at the "months in" mark that are emaciated, bald, and mostly without fingernails and toenails.

There's nothing else I can think of that compares. Being a "technical person", I struggle with some embarrassment talking to them. The "seriously...this is best science can do???" overtones are there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNA nanobot 'starves' tumors by cornholio on Sunday March 04, 2018 @11:06AM (#16515154)

> The "seriously...this is best science can do???" overtones are there.

Drug companies have billions of dollars for research, they have a legal framework where any advancement can be patented for decades and exploited in an almost limitless market for a cancer drug.

So the incentives seem to be there, the answer is one of two things: either this is the best science can do at this time, or something is fundamentally fucked up in the way we approach science and apply it to real life problems.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:DNA nanobot 'starves' tumors by hellofunk on Sunday March 04, 2018 @10:47AM (#16515066)

It's progress. The techniques may seem barbaric, but the reality is that many people are cured by them. The future will be better, but the present could be a lot worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]