Re:What We Found When X-Raying Some MLB Baseballs
by whatisunseen on Saturday March 03, 2018 @11:04AM
(#16509841)
Is anyone else surprised by the sample size? I'm not sure that eight baseballs provides enough data for any relevant conclusions, especially when the differences are so small to begin with.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What We Found When X-Raying Some MLB Baseballs
by mortehu on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:07PM
(#16510208)
Assuming there has always been 50% light balls and 50% heavy balls, the probability of picking 4/4 heavy balls from the earlier period and 4/4 light balls from the later period by chance is 0.4%.
Although this statistic might be less relevant if the balls were not statistically randomly selected.
Re:What We Found When X-Raying Some MLB Baseballs
by ada1981 on Saturday March 03, 2018 @01:34PM
(#16510738)
Presumably the eBay balls were probably homers or hit into the stands, no?
Re:What We Found When X-Raying Some MLB Baseballs
by Jackim on Saturday March 03, 2018 @04:33PM
(#16511715)
They could also be foul tips or grounders thrown to the crowd.
Re:What We Found When X-Raying Some MLB Baseballs
by bayindirh on Saturday March 03, 2018 @11:54AM
(#16510140)
If all the balls have shown variations within the same tolerances, that would be true, but balls grouped in a meaningful way, and these groups have shown negligible differences among themselves.
Because of this tight variation within the groups, 8 balls are enough IMHO.