Re:Why the U.S. Treasury Killed a Latvian Bank
by madaxe_again on Thursday March 01, 2018 @03:39PM
(#16496055)
At their scale, that's a small fine. Barely 10% of annual net profit.
Re:Why the U.S. Treasury Killed a Latvian Bank
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday March 01, 2018 @03:42PM
(#16496097)
Better metric is relative to Mexican, or North American, profits. Those are the markets in which they did their shenanigans. Relative to those, it’s a substantial absolute and relative sum.
Re:Why the U.S. Treasury Killed a Latvian Bank
by lukeschlather on Thursday March 01, 2018 @04:21PM
(#16496479)
If I'm interpreting the article correctly, they made at least $888 million off of their scheme. It's likely that a significant amount of their illicit profit was not detected by the enforcement agencies, so $2 billion sounds like they potentially profited even factoring in the fine, it's only a little over twice their profit.
Re:Why the U.S. Treasury Killed a Latvian Bank
by wavefunction on Thursday March 01, 2018 @09:51PM
(#16498567)
You have to make the entire organism pay a price or else it gets laughed off as a temporary setback.
Jail these folks, and the folks they reported to. You start throwing some bankers in jail and you'll see some magic "self-regulation" kick in.
Re:Why the U.S. Treasury Killed a Latvian Bank
by jessaustin on Friday March 02, 2018 @09:08AM
(#16501423)
The last thing federal prosecutors want to do is make rich and powerful white people worry. They know which side their bread is buttered on.
HSBC was fined nearly $2 billion [1]. (Still a shame none of the complicit went to jail.)
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-documentary-re-exa...