Machine Learning Crash Course

Re:Machine Learning Crash Course by acconrad on Thursday March 01, 2018 @12:56PM (#16494374)

> The obsolete gatekeeping by the AI/ML elites who say "you can't use AI/ML unless you have a PhD/5 years research experience" is one of the things I really hate about the industry.

So what are they hoping to achieve with this course? I'm genuinely asking because part of me wants to take the course, but another part of me feels like what's the point if, even through many additional courses to build up a skill set, Google wouldn't hire you as an ML engineer unless you basically start your career back to a junior engineer but in machine learning at another company.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Machine Learning Crash Course by solarkraft on Thursday March 01, 2018 @01:31PM (#16494685)

I have a feeling that they're trying to get people familiar with TensorFlow and thus very compatible with their cloud computing services.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Machine Learning Crash Course by eanzenberg on Thursday March 01, 2018 @01:42PM (#16494819)

I dunno.. for this level of ml scikit/numpy is way more accessible than tensorflow.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Machine Learning Crash Course by mdda on Friday March 02, 2018 @04:37AM (#16500218)

Look at it from an interview perspective. If I ask "are you interested in exploring ML", and you're enthusiastic, my next questions are : What have you done? Have you taken any courses? GitHub? Blog Posts?

If the answer is that you're waiting for a special sign that it's worth doing before making an effort, then that really tells me that your enthusiasm for doing ML is not reality-based. Doing the ML thing is a pretty different mindset from other software jobs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Machine Learning Crash Course by pilooch on Thursday March 01, 2018 @01:01PM (#16494423)

No but you'll ready yourself for the (geometric) programming of the next twenty years or so.

[ Parent | on HN ]