News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Makefile I use with JavaScript projects by aidenn0 on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @02:07PM (#16485738)
I don't run into those too often.

When I do, there are two cases:

1) All dependencies are on only one output file (e.g. link stages that generate .map files, compile phases that generate separate .o and debug files). I just treat these as normal

2) I may need to depend on each of the files (I don't use yacc/bison, but it sounds like this would qualify). I select one file to be the main output and have the .do file for that ensure that the secondary outputs go to a mangled name; I then have the .do files for the secondary outputs rename the mangled file.

quick example for generating foo.c/foo.h

foo.c.do:

    generate-file --cout "$3" --hout "$2-mangled.h"
foo.h.do:

    redo-ifchange "$2.c"
    mv "$2-mangled.h" "$3"
Re:The Makefile I use with JavaScript projects by beagle3 on Thursday March 01, 2018 @06:48AM (#16491250)
If the h output changes but the c doesn’t, this rule will miss it.

I once solved it by making a tar file or all the outputs and extracting it to both .c and .h but that’s incredibly kludgy, still looking for a better solution

Re:The Makefile I use with JavaScript projects by aidenn0 on Thursday March 01, 2018 @01:58PM (#16494986)
As long as the timestamp changes on the C file, that's fine, right? At least with the version of redo I use timestamps are used by default, not file contents.