News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Built to Last vs. Built to Flip by parker on Tuesday April 15, 2008 @08:09PM (#164693)
>> hearing day after day after day about quick "exit strategies" on news.yc has been very depressing

I'm not a huge fan of hyperbole. Care to back this up? I don't think news.yc is obsessed with ripping people off... what part of 'make something people want' contradicts creating value?

Re:Built to Last vs. Built to Flip by ecommercematt on Tuesday April 15, 2008 @08:50PM (#164719)
quick exit strategy != ripping people off

That being said, I agree that there are plenty of motives for hoping for an early exit other than "pure greed."

Re:Built to Last vs. Built to Flip by freax on Tuesday April 15, 2008 @10:00PM (#164774)
> what part of 'make something people want' contradicts creating value?

Crack? Junk food? Time-wasting websites? People rarely act even in their own best interests.

Re:Built to Last vs. Built to Flip by plinkplonk on Wednesday April 16, 2008 @07:46AM (#165059)
>> what part of 'make something people want' contradicts creating value?

>Crack? Junk food? Time-wasting websites? People rarely act even in their own best interests.

Who said anything about acting in their own "best interests"? (and who decides these?)

Make what people want, not what you think they ought to want. Value, like beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder

Re:Built to Last vs. Built to Flip by freax on Wednesday April 16, 2008 @04:23PM (#165593)
Except these things can be empirically shown to be harmful. The "value" of playing EverCrack or WoW all day every day can destroy many other valuable things in your life. This is why addiction is considered a problem, not a value -- except to pushers.