Re:Scientists aim to pull peer review out of the 17th century
by mlspector on Monday February 26, 2018 @02:01PM
(#16467954)
I'm one of the main developers of OpenReview.net, and we're trying to do something similar to APPRAISE as described in the OP. Right now we mainly focus on the machine learning research community, and one conference in particular - ICLR - has been experimenting with varying degrees of anonymity in their peer review process.
We've had some preliminary discussions about evaluating the impact of anonymity on peer review "quality", but so far the proper way to analyze the data isn't quite clear to us.
We do have an open API that allows the general public to access the data, but I'm embarrassed to say that our documentation is very sparse right now. If anyone reading this is interested in exploring the data, shoot us an email at [email protected] and we can help you get started.
We've had some preliminary discussions about evaluating the impact of anonymity on peer review "quality", but so far the proper way to analyze the data isn't quite clear to us.
We do have an open API that allows the general public to access the data, but I'm embarrassed to say that our documentation is very sparse right now. If anyone reading this is interested in exploring the data, shoot us an email at [email protected] and we can help you get started.
https://openreview.net/about