Re:Scientists aim to pull peer review out of the 17th century
by kickout on Monday February 26, 2018 @12:15PM
(#16466935)
Anonymity would be better in my opinion (to start off with). Way too much name recognition, and "good old boys club" dynamics happening in way too many areas of science i follow (genetics, agriculture, prediction)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scientists aim to pull peer review out of the 17th century
by neuromantik8086 on Monday February 26, 2018 @01:14PM
(#16467509)
Pseudonymity might also be a good option (although it also has its pitfalls):