Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by cornholio on Monday February 26, 2018 @08:58AM
(#16465247)
He specifically mentions a much lower protocol overhead, implying a translation of some sort, as opposed to just encapsulation. As an ex-programmer, is unlikely Musk would make that confusion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by mozumder on Monday February 26, 2018 @10:16AM
(#16465827)
It's most likely a version of the ATM protocol[1]. Point-to-point, small packets, etc.. We used a version of that when I was working on the Iridium project.
Likely the exact same thing here, especially if they hired the same engineers.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_Transfer_Mode
Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by walrus01 on Monday February 26, 2018 @10:22AM
(#16465869)
You worked on the original Iridium satellite architecture? I am sure a lot of people here may not know how fully groundbreaking it was. Considering it is now 20-year-old tech the satellite-to-satellite Ka-band trunk links are an amazing technical achievement. That and the voice codec they came up with to make humans intelligible at 2400bps.
Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by fealios on Monday February 26, 2018 @12:16PM
(#16466943)
Damn, those are some sexy credentials.
Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by westbywest on Monday February 26, 2018 @10:51AM
(#16466112)
Indeed, and I'd expect ATM's fixed packet size to make for more manageable flow control over variable (and simultaneous) pipes.
Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by arbitrage on Monday February 26, 2018 @09:21AM
(#16465400)
Are you ever an ex-programmer? I would say, once a programmer, always a programmer.
Re:Elon Musk said SpaceX's multi 1000 satellite Internet ser...
by SpeciesInvader on Monday February 26, 2018 @10:09AM
(#16465779)
I refer to myself as a recovering software engineer/programmer. Never really out of the addiction, but not in the weeds anymore.