Re:Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundat...
by tmz on Sunday February 25, 2018 @05:25AM
(#16458224)
Maybe you should also read https://twitter.com/ShitcoinDotCom/status/965910847645212672
It is from the same author
Re:Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundat...
by Blackthorn on Sunday February 25, 2018 @01:12PM
(#16460261)
Your point is what, exactly?
Doing research into things, publishing results, and shorting is perfectly legitimate. It's how Lumber Liquidators was found to be using formaldehyde. Just because someone says something you don't like, and they have a short position in the thing, doesn't mean they are wrong.
Re:Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundat...
by generalizethis on Sunday February 25, 2018 @09:18PM
(#16462554)
He went out of his way to foul up (read the comment section for how obviously), not that that validates his assumption that ease-of-use = IOT suitability.
Re:Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundat...
by Blackthorn on Sunday February 25, 2018 @09:55PM
(#16462717)
He most certainly did not. In fact, you already legislated this exact point with him and he explained exactly why he made the choices he made -- in your own comment history.
Re:Email exchange between MIT Media Lab and the IOTA Foundat...
by tmz on Monday February 26, 2018 @03:08AM
(#16463883)
I did exactly what he tried to do. It took me less than 1 hour and my node was in sync.
If you use a dedicated server with sufficient bandwidth and not your laptop at home for a fullnode this can easily been done.
IOT devices are connected to this fullnode and are not fullnodes themselves. I dont know what made him think otherwise.
It’s a fun read and you’ll probably end up unimpressed to say the least.