For example, as reported in this thread (I didn't test), without javascript the page reads "0 days". Then that 0 is updated automatically.

Obviously it SHOULD read "loading..." and then that loading... text should be replaced.

Why do I point this out?

Because this oversight coincidentally serves the purposes of the page (its humor), it's a particularly strong impact when that reads 0 days.

It's not supposed to actually read that way, but, there you have it. A good example of the principle in practice.

You need to allow everything from twitter and related domains even frames for it to show anything but 0. I was wondering what I missed this time.

Incredibly incompetent. This is a well known issue with any dynamic pricing ecommerce site.

Only if this is the only check. You can implement ut for ergonomics

I don't understand why people make these Hanlon's razor comments. This doesn't put forth any argument or new information, it just mentions the name Hanlon. As if the fact a pithy saying exists gives it authority in itself. Maybe we should start reminding people to consider Nolnah's razor as well.

GP only said "i think", GP is not suffocating any discussion. I doubt serious investigations care for what random people say on internet forums.

I think your accusations at the end are unfair and out of place, not to say ridiculous.

Your perception of people repeating this line is very weird to me.

Hanlon's razor is not something you "invoke" to end a discussion. It is not a constitunional law. It is not a physical law. It is not even an informal guideline to guide arguments in the internet.

It is just a clever line you quote to represent your opinion. It is just like to say "occams razor", or "red herring", or any other expression that means something.

I think you take internet debate too serious and give way, but waaaaay too much importance to the words some random person chose to express their opinion.

I read the original sentence with exact same meaning of "i think it was incompetence, not theft".

Why to use this expression then? Because maybe they thought it was a shorter way to express the whole opinion.

You are reading too much into it

The difference is when you call something a "red herring" you also point out why. Or if you invoke "occam's razor" you simultaneously propose a simpler explanation. Whereas Hanlon's razor comments like the one above literally do nothing except say "Hanlon."

Anyway, I don't think me and GP are alone in being irrationally annoyed by this cliche.