News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Signatures of positive selection in autism spectrum disor... by cgiles on Friday February 23, 2018 @10:02PM (#16451383)
Thanks for the links, I will check them out. An embarassing correction: the 450K is (as you well know) not a SNP array. Can you tell I've been doing more than my fair share of methylation stuff recently?

The fundamental problem I have with your reply, though, is that the authors were not really concerned with any particular SNP. They wanted to make statements about the group of ASD-related SNPs. Clearly it is infeasible to do most of the things you have suggested here with >100 SNPs. Given that, what do you suggest they should have done?

Re:Signatures of positive selection in autism spectrum disor... by searine on Friday February 23, 2018 @10:55PM (#16451563)
> Given that, what do you suggest they should have done

Not used the term positive selection. If they hadn't done that this would have been boring, but fine.