Re:Bitmain, the largest mining hardware company, made around...
by curyous on Friday February 23, 2018 @07:02PM
(#16450706)
Bitcoin mining seems inefficient now, but when the network is carrying 100x more or 10,000x more transactions, won't it be extremely efficient? (On a per-transaction basis)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bitmain, the largest mining hardware company, made around...
by proofofmoon on Friday February 23, 2018 @07:24PM
(#16450812)
O(n) total world energy expenditure on Bitcoin scales to O(1) transactions, so it currently only gets worse as more energy is poured into the system for the same transaction output.
There's a few solutions proposed:
- off-chain transactions (Lightning Network) - unknown complexity
- increased block size (Bitcoin Cash) - O(n) -> some larger O(1)
- a different consensus system (proof of stake blockchain, distributed proof of stake blockchain, Tangle, etc.) - varies
It's possible that the Bitcoin ecosystem will adopt one of these solutions in the future, but there doesn't appear to be a silver bullet right now.
Re:Bitmain, the largest mining hardware company, made around...
by curuinor on Friday February 23, 2018 @07:22PM
(#16450801)
There have now been about a half-dozen various suggestions to get the network to carry more transactions, all of which are mostly failures, except for Lightning Network, which is now in the process of becoming a failure.
Re:Bitmain, the largest mining hardware company, made around...
by atomical on Friday February 23, 2018 @08:57PM
(#16451169)
Lightning is DOA. Who has ever heard of opening a payment channel to buy a cup of coffee?