News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by ghostcluster on Thursday February 22, 2018 @10:15PM (#16443913)
The ruling ethnic elite (and fully 91.51% of the population as of 2010) are Han Chinese, and you could say they enforce somewhat of an ethnostate. Foreigners cannot become citizens even if they marry a native Chinese and contribute to their economy.
Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by baybal2 on Friday February 23, 2018 @04:03AM (#16445120)
>Foreigners cannot become citizens even if they marry a native Chinese and contribute to their economy.

Well, there are a "whopping" 1500 new naturalised citizens since the passage of 1998 citizenship law :)

Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by Arn_Thor on Friday February 23, 2018 @03:39AM (#16445018)
Pretty strong cases have been made that the Han Chinese ethnicity is an invention. This makes some sense given China's pre-CCP plethora of wildly different languages, and quite distinct appearance differences between provinces. That's hard to explain if one adopts the "majority ethnicity" view. Of course, from a practical perspective, once everyone believes the myth then it's a de facto reality

https://www.hrichina.org/en/content/4573 http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/04/13/the-myth-of-one-china/

Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by ghostcluster on Friday February 23, 2018 @03:17PM (#16449155)
"Han is a social construct" doesn't change the fact that they operate as a de facto ethnostate that keeps foreigners out and their more phenotypically distinct ethnic minorities out of power.
Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by oh_sigh on Friday February 23, 2018 @12:35AM (#16444461)
Is that rule true even if, say, a Han Chinese citizen marries as second generation USAmerican+Han person?
Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by barry-cotter on Friday February 23, 2018 @03:19AM (#16444961)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationality_law_of_the_People%...

In practice, naturalizing as a Chinese national is extremely rare, even more so when the sheer population of the region is taken into account and compared to other comparable regions, such as the European Union, United States and India. Majority of foreign permanent residents simply remain that for the duration of their residency, without ever being asked or forced to naturalize. During the Fifth National Population Census (2000), only 941 naturalized citizens that do not belong to any of Communist Party of China's recognized 56 indigenous ethnic groups (which already includes Koreans, Vietnamese, and Russians)[13] were counted in China's mainland.[14] As of 2010, the total number of naturalized Chinese was only 1,448 in Mainland China, out of the population of over 1.33 billion. In 1990, there were over 3,000.[15]

More foreigners have applied for naturalization as Chinese nationals with permanent residency of Hong Kong since the handover in 1997. Among Hong Kong residents from 1997 to 2012, 3,411 Pakistanis, 3,399 Indonesians, 2,487 Indians, 1,115 Vietnamese, and 387 Filipinos have been naturalized.[16] One case of mass naturalization occurred in 2003, when less than 200 Damans, an ethnic-Nepali people who had resided in Gyirong County of Tibet for over two centuries, were granted Chinese nationality. The serial numbers on their naturalization certificates suggested that around 4,000 people (including the Damans) had naturalized as Chinese nationals in Mainland China until 2003.[17]

Re:China's Xinjiang surveillance is the dystopian future nob... by _cs2017_ on Thursday February 22, 2018 @10:39PM (#16444008)
Yes. I don't disagree.