The Wall Street Journal has built a paywall that bends to the individual reader

Re:The Wall Street Journal has built a paywall that bends to... by skybrian on Thursday February 22, 2018 @07:03PM (#16442837)

I'm wondering if the Wall Street Journal still qualifies as quality journalism or would something like Bloomberg or the Financial Times be better?

(The WSJ editorial page has always been terrible, but the news organization at least used to have a good reputation.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Wall Street Journal has built a paywall that bends to... by jerkstate on Thursday February 22, 2018 @07:24PM (#16442962)

I have both a WSJ and FT subscription and WSJ seems to have better US and middle east coverage. FT seems to have more East Asian (as expected) and European coverage. WSJ is softer on the Trump administration with some articles in support of Trump policy initiatives, which probably turns some people off. FT is broadly negative about US economic populism and the Trump administration.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Wall Street Journal has built a paywall that bends to... by aventrix on Thursday February 22, 2018 @08:37PM (#16443450)

My comment wasn't meant to apply to a specific website/newspaper per se, but the general state of online news media.

[ Parent | on HN ]