Re:You Probably Don't Need a Blockchain
by nosuchthing on Thursday February 22, 2018 @03:45AM
(#16436186)
so you can lose the deed to your house because it gets hacked..?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:You Probably Don't Need a Blockchain
by dlubarov on Thursday February 22, 2018 @01:38PM
(#16440063)
Physical deeds are forged all the time, and sorting it out requires a quiet title lawsuit. A stolen electronic deed would be handled similarly. You would ask a court to declare the stolen title invalid and issue a new one.
Re:You Probably Don't Need a Blockchain
by voiper1 on Thursday February 22, 2018 @02:43PM
(#16440749)
so if the court is doing that, then we have a centralized power... the opposite of the idea of blockchain.
Re:You Probably Don't Need a Blockchain
by dlubarov on Thursday February 22, 2018 @05:14PM
(#16441996)
Just to make sure it's clear, I'm not saying that courts should have any special power to manipulate the blockchain, just that they could declare a stolen title invalid, and issue a new one in the form of a new colored coin on the blockchain.
I'm not claiming any benefit related to government control, just that escrow would be unnecessary.
Re:You Probably Don't Need a Blockchain
by nosuchthing on Thursday February 22, 2018 @10:16PM
(#16443915)
At which point the blockchain is not needed.
A centralized source will be held accountable to the legal demands, thus as trustworthy as the blockchain yet significantly more beneficial for all users in terms of speed, storage and utility.