News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Signal Foundation by jkarneges on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @05:28PM (#16433562)
Google Talk absolutely federated: http://googletalk.blogspot.com/2006/01/xmpp-federation.html

Unfortunately they were the only major service provider to do so, and the capability was later discontinued.

Re:Signal Foundation by e12e on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @05:57PM (#16433722)
[ed: aha! They didn't really support federation in a standards compliant way:

"However, since the Google Talk Service does not support server-to-server encryption via TLS (something that was required by RFC 3920 in 2004), a number of servers (including jabber.org) refuse to establish a connection since May 2014."

https://xmpp.org/2015/03/no-its-not-the-end-of-xmpp-for-goog...

I recall there were issues...]

Wait, what? You could chat from [email protected] on your bespoke xmpp server and send messages to user@gmail without needing a Google account and vice-versa?

Was Google talk really so unpopular that I didn't seriously try to use it until it became the walled garden that didn't support server federation?

Re:Signal Foundation by jkarneges on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @06:17PM (#16433837)
> Wait, what? You could chat from [email protected] on your bespoke xmpp server and send messages to user@gmail without needing a Google account and vice-versa?

For some glorious years between 2006 and 2013 (Hangouts), this was indeed possible. I run my own XMPP server and I used to chat with GTalk users all the time. For literally years.

> They didn't really support federation in a standards compliant way

It was standards compliant enough. In the original RFC, server-to-server TLS was mandatory to implement but not mandatory to enable/deploy. The XMPP community later moved towards enforced server-to-server encryption, but this was many years later and had little impact on GTalk federation during the time that it was supported.

Re:Signal Foundation by e12e on Thursday February 22, 2018 @01:48AM (#16435707)
I remember looking into it, and discovering that it didn't work in a sane way (ie: no server tls support). Why would I want to expose traffic unencrypted? Especially considering dangerous content, like attachments etc.

Now I see that Ms allows federation for on-premise lync - but not for office 365. :-(

Everyone wants their own silo, and force their multitude of awful clients on people.

Re:Signal Foundation by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @09:17PM (#16434693)
Actually, it still worked for existing contacts until half a year or so ago, when they seem to have silently dropped it completely (I haven't really investigated, contacts I had on google simply moved to other servers, that fixed that).