Re:JupyterLab is ready for users
by ChrisRackauckas on Tuesday February 20, 2018 @11:22AM
(#16421459)
I agree here. Being able to write code in the mathematical rendering is such a beautiful feature of Mathematica that Jupyter is missing. I am not sure how it's outclassed as a notebook because of this. As an IDE? Sure, Mathematica's notebook isn't a good IDE at all. But as a notebook for writing mathematical statements, it's fantastic. It's the one thing I need in order to go to an only Julia workflow.
> Being able to write code in the mathematical rendering
I wonder, what do you mean by this? You mean it's possible to write code in the Out[] cells in Mathematica? (is that possible?)
Or do you mean writing math in the notebook?
Re:JupyterLab is ready for users
by RunningToMars on Wednesday February 21, 2018 @10:10AM
(#16429953)
People often overlook the eclipse IDE for Mathematica...
Yours is a good question, and I can't really provide a good answer. Firstly, I suppose I wish for something more akin to an IDE with a proper list of variables, functions, classes, & cetera; tabs; and as the screenshots of this JupyterLab beta release show, a capability for displaying different data types in different self-contained windows that are not in-lines to the notebook document.
I probably expressed myself very poorly.
[1] https://imgur.com/a/83ZyF