Re:China’s great leap forward in science
by archgoon on Sunday February 18, 2018 @12:20PM
(#16407036)
> This week's news on Australian deputy PM living with his mistress (not his partner in his own words) in his friend's apartment rent free is just another good dose of corruption without consequence drama.
Sorry; I'm not familiar with this situation. Where's the misuse of public funds?
Re:China’s great leap forward in science
by dis-sys on Sunday February 18, 2018 @01:57PM
(#16407523)
so it is normal and acceptable for deputy PM to be living in his friend's investment property rent free for 6 months when he had an affair with one of his staff? his mistress became pregnant and was "offloaded" from his office to minimise any political damage.
it also worth noticing that Australia is not the best example to use here. e.g. the NBN project would be considered as a typical corruption case under the Chinese laws, in fact one can argue that it is the textbook definition of corruption in Chinese standard. Think about it - there is no ethics showstopper when laying fiber in Sydney/Melbourne, why the majority of residences in those two cities still don't get access to the NBN first promised back in 2007 after billions of AUD of their tax money already spent on NBN? Corruption is just corruption, calling it red tape is not helping. the rules are simple there - if you are not qualified for the job, it is fine, you get replaced/demoted, if you use red tape/endless paper work as excuses to misuse tax money (e.g. NBN), that is corruption and Central Commission for Discipline Inspection looks after you and your mates.
btw, by Chinese standards, the NBN corruption case is enough for many life imprisonment sentences. This week's news on Australian deputy PM living with his mistress (not his partner in his own words) in his friend's apartment rent free is just another good dose of corruption without consequence drama.