> Maybe I’m alone in this, but I feel like if you’re going to break up a company with antitrust regulation you should at least be able to point to a way they’re abusing their power or are making a worse experience for customers.

How about selling shitty eclipse glasses that hurt peoples eyes and making it impossible to order the real ones?

How about combining counterfeit and genuine products in the same SKU to make it impossible to order the real ones?

How about the fact that Amazon are not held liable for selling counterfeit products period? If WalMart attempted to sell a counterfeit product on their website they'd have a class action against them yesterday.

Are those not "worse experience" for consumers?