News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The High Cost of Not Doing Experiments (2015) by TheOtherHobbes on Saturday February 17, 2018 @10:11AM (#16400993)
Flat earthers have zero influence on the development of physics, and their ideas don't matter to anyone except themselves and a few opportunistic journalists.

This is not true in the social sciences where it's very hard to do physics-grade research, especially given that the social sciences are very politicised, and research is often done to prove a political or moral point.

So in practice our understanding of personal and social/political psychology is pre-Copernican. There's a lot of moralising - which you will agree or disagree with, depending on your predisposition - but very little high quality research into the way that moral and political decisions are made individually and collectively.

We're left with a mythology of free objective democratic choice in politics which is clearly naive and reliably breeds monsters, but as yet there isn't a better model of choice to replace it.

Re:The High Cost of Not Doing Experiments (2015) by ejstronge on Saturday February 17, 2018 @04:26PM (#16402810)
I agree with your point - as mentioned in my first line, I state that such a comprehensive model would be very helpful for academic purposes.

I don't believe that it would change popular opinion - indeed, flat-earthers and other 'anti-intellectual' fads continue despite not being accepted by serious researchers.