Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by ryanwaggoner on Friday February 16, 2018 @12:33AM
(#16390129)
Believe it or not, I didn't just "come upon" this realization and I've taken multiple econ classes (though I'd like to take more). Also, our unemployment benefits are a pretty sorry excuse for a social safety net, which is why I wasn't specifically talking about them here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by mrep on Friday February 16, 2018 @01:28AM
(#16390356)
> Also, our unemployment benefits are a pretty sorry excuse for a social safety net, which is why I wasn't specifically talking about them here.
What and how much of a safety net do we need considering the opportunity cost of supporting said safety net?
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by mrep on Friday February 16, 2018 @12:59AM
(#16390247)
Sorry, you didn't mention economics at all but all of your points are discussed thoroughly and pretty well agreed upon in economic textbooks so I assumed you weren't aware (since if you were, I thought you would have sourced them).
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by ryanwaggoner on Friday February 16, 2018 @01:01AM
(#16390257)
In general, conversations are more interesting and edifying when they consist of more than someone just saying "my reaction on this topic is what economics textbooks say" :)
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by mrep on Friday February 16, 2018 @01:22AM
(#16390335)
That part was 100% me suggesting you read up on economics as it seemed like a subject you were unaware of but one that you would totally love since it completely matched your logic.
My main point was bringing up unemployment benefits.