Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by thesmallestcat on Thursday February 15, 2018 @11:27PM
(#16389862)
I think it's sort of like first-class flying. There's no logistical reason for not boarding the plane rear-to-front, but you can get people to pay for the privilege of being first, so why not? Non-Prime customers are second priority, and expected fulfillment is adjusted accordingly.
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by throwaway9980 on Friday February 16, 2018 @12:09AM
(#16390015)
It’s a good analogy. I must be hopelessly optimistic to think there will be a reckoning for businesses that intentionally provide a worse experience.
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by byproxy on Friday February 16, 2018 @01:18AM
(#16390324)
The reckoning would be you no longer using their business, wouldn't it?
While I still get some books from Amazon, I've been increasingly purchasing through Abebooks. They tend to be more accurate in what they stock with regards to ISBN, which is what I go by when purchasing a book as I like to get specific editions.
Re:The unnecessary demise of Barnes and Noble
by plorkyeran on Friday February 16, 2018 @01:38AM
(#16390382)
I doubt they go out of their way to delay the order, simply because that isn't the most cost-efficient thing for them to do. I would assume that they just have a priority queue of orders to process, and sometimes that queue gets backed up and takes a few days to clear out the non-Prime/expedited orders.
What’s the deal with this? I turned off prime a couple of years ago and it certainly feels like they’re intentionally slow processing orders.
For books, I only buy used and try to pick nearby sellers. Often the media mail shipment will show up in 2-3 days. Pretty great.