Re:MongoDB gets support for multi-document ACID transactions
by crdoconnor on Thursday February 15, 2018 @11:15AM
(#16385154)
>Clearly people building simple crud websites with slick JS features didn’t agree
I doubt it's that they didn't agree, it's more likely that the thought simply never occurred to them.
Mongo's marketing is directed with laser like focus on the beginner developer seeking out tutorials to build a website, etc. Questions about data consistency simply never arise in that context.
Later on that developer who was gently guided towards using mongo by all of the slick marketing will likely try to defend their decision when somebody attacks it ("their data consistency problems aren't that bad" or "data consistency isn't that important"), but that's something else.
Re:MongoDB gets support for multi-document ACID transactions
by gameswithgo on Thursday February 15, 2018 @11:17AM
(#16385168)
>Clearly people building simple crud websites with slick JS features didn’t agree otherwise Mongo would be gone
Popularity is not always a good measure of what ideas are good ones.
True for databases, but not true for businesses.
> Losing or corrupting data is the worst thing a database can do.
Clearly people building simple crud websites with slick JS features didn’t agree otherwise Mongo would be gone and Rethink would be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.