Re:Who Killed the Junior Developer?
by Trundle on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @12:17AM
(#16373655)
If you're going to end up paying market rate anyway, why not just skip the training cost and hire them after someone else has put in the hard yards?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Because the problem domain, process and tooling is specific to your company and a senior person also needs time to learn them.
Plus, turning a junior into a senior developer isn't exactly a boolean switch, that is turned over night. It's a process and that junior developer will spend a lot of intermediate time between both states, in which he's still very useful, yet affordable since he's probably paid below senior level.
Re:Who Killed the Junior Developer?
by wlesieutre on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @12:47AM
(#16373765)
That's true. Presumably the junior developer is cheaper while they're junior, but if nobody's hiring them anymore then I guess they're not cheaper enough to compensate for needing to train them.
Maybe by creating a workplace where developers want to stay you could keep them around at slightly under market rate? Not everyone is looking to job hop every 6 months. But the amount below market rate that you seem to end up by staying in one job feels like it's unreasonably large.