News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog... by jjeaff on Monday February 12, 2018 @08:44PM (#16364095)
I think you misunderstand the argument made by many who say "a corporation is people". "Corporate personhood" is just a word the left uses to make it sound crazy.

In reality, the argument is that you can't restrict a corporation's speech because using a corporation to speak is merely a form or method people use to speak.

You could speak via billboards, grass roots organizations, a radio show, lettets, or even a company you own.

The government can't curtail your speech no matter the method.

Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog... by lotharbot on Monday February 12, 2018 @09:19PM (#16364255)
more generally, "corporate personhood" in US law, going back to at least the 1790s and in other countries going back even longer, serves the legal purpose of establishing that when people work together to do something under the "corporate" banner (which allows them to have a succession of members working toward a common goal and pooling resources), they retain rights like speech, property ownership, and ability to enter into or terminate contracts including hiring and firing employees. This connects to the idea (expressed by chief justice Marshall) that "The great object of an incorporation is to bestow the character and properties of individuality on a collective and changing body of men."
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog... by wutbrodo on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @04:13AM (#16365761)
Sheesh I wish I had read your response before posting my own. This more succinctly captures what I'm trying to say.