News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by ghostbrainalpha on Monday February 12, 2018 @02:04PM (#16361038)
Similar experience, I think my problem with the algorithm is similar to slowing down to look at the car wreck on the side of the road.

I have a few a"friends" that post horrible stuff. Conspiracy theories, rants, and other posts that are just symptoms of poor mental health.

At first I stopped to read these in HORROR and disgust, because they stood out so much from the rest of my feed. Facebook takes that as a signal that this is the content I enjoy, and begins to feature it more and more heavily.

Looking back, if I had understood what was happening, I could have used Facebook correctly and worked WITH the algorithm. You have to think about the long term consequences of your viewing activity, and think of using your attention like farming to grow a good feed.

Facebook eventually needs to introduce a self-curation tool, so that people can promote the things/people they want, and remove the elements they dislike without Unfriending Grandma. For me it's probably to late. At 34 the college friends that I would like to keep up with haven't interacted with me in 5+ years, and the social awkwardness of rekindling those relationships isn't worth it.

On an unrelated note, I think many social networks will continue to die this way. As people move from PEAK FRIENDS in colleges to having lives where immediate family takes priority, I think the social presence will fade. The networks will take the blame, like MYSPACE, and FRIENDSHIP just are not good tools anymore, when really it was the person who went from having 100+ active relationships to 20.

Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by opportune on Monday February 12, 2018 @03:01PM (#16361514)
Facebook's algorithm almost seems like a quintessential example of why you need to choose good metrics in optimization problems. Maximizing user engagement sounds great - it means people are using your website and enjoying it more, right? Turns out people weren't enjoying it more, they were using it more because Facebook was shoving controversial content (e.g. dubious-quality news, debates, crazy people) down people's throats and they couldn't keep their eyes away.

You know how Facebook tries to get me engaged? It puts photos of my ex-girlfriend and her friends on the top of my feed. Sure you're going to get me to look, but I'm not going to leave the website feeling as good as when I logged on. You bring up a good point about how you have to think about the long term consequences of your viewing, but then I feel that you don't get a genuine experience when you use the platform, and if Facebook wants this, they seem to really over-estimate users' mindfulness wrt what they're actually doing.

If Facebook never figures things out, I hope whatever network comes next doesn't get greedy like they did. In particular, they need to focus on driving engagement with positive interactions and content.

Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by ryanmarsh on Monday February 12, 2018 @03:56PM (#16362040)
Facebook's algorithm almost seems like a quintessential example of why you need to choose good metrics in optimization problems.

IMHO Facebook gave the golden goose (algo) enough feed to gorge itself on and now it is unhealthy and only lays rusty iron eggs.

Yes, they optimized for engagement, and it destroyed the platform. This is like a parable or something. Truly.

In business school 10 years from now I fully expect people to write case studies on the business effects of algo optimization and local minima, etc, etc...

Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by cortesoft on Monday February 12, 2018 @04:29PM (#16362402)
But they get paid per eyeball, not by the enjoyment level of the people using the system. They don't care WHY you can't keep your eyes away, as long as you can't keep your eyes away.

From their end, their metric was perfect.

Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by opportune on Monday February 12, 2018 @04:38PM (#16362500)
Perfect in the short-term, sure, but if people are leaving the platform then their long-term eyeballs might be suffering for the sake of short-term eyeballs
Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by Balgair on Monday February 12, 2018 @04:44PM (#16362564)
It's worse that that. Not only does FB as a company get paid per eyeball, the individual managers get paid per eyeball. Inside the org, the incentives are perverse.

https://www.wired.com/story/inside-facebook-mark-zuckerberg-...

Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by kstrauser on Monday February 12, 2018 @05:25PM (#16362940)
> Looking back, if I had understood what was happening, I could have used Facebook correctly and worked WITH the algorithm.

I wholly disagree. You used Facebook correctly. It's Facebook's fault for poorly interpreting how you used it. Anyone who's ever been stuck in traffic behind rubberneckers creeping past an accident should understand that bursts of attention don't at all mean that you have long term interest in something.

> Facebook eventually needs to introduce a self-curation tool, so that people can promote the things/people they want

A million times this. Facebook desperately needs matched like and dislike buttons, not for the purposes of voting content up or down, but so that it can learn what you actually want to see. Most music services grok this concept.

Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by workthrowaway27 on Monday February 12, 2018 @02:20PM (#16361168)
There is (or at least used to be) a menu next to people's posts that lets you stop following similar posts (or unfollow the person completely while remaining friends).
Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by megaman22 on Monday February 12, 2018 @04:00PM (#16362081)
At least on the Android app, this is incredibly broken. Not only does it often not actually hide the item you try to hide, but most of the options that are available for this menu on the desktop web app are missing, so you can't actually unfollow the person 7 out of 10 times.
Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by pbhjpbhj on Monday February 12, 2018 @03:41PM (#16361889)
Still there, still works.
Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by book_mentioned on Monday February 12, 2018 @02:40PM (#16361360)
Re:Facebook lost around 2.8M U.S. users under 25 last year by tim333 on Monday February 12, 2018 @10:10PM (#16364442)
Seconded. I'm kind of surprised people use facebook without it. Bit like surfing the web without an ad blocker.