News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on 97% of California Cities Failed to Meet State Housing Goals. Parent comment

Re:97% of California Cities Failed to Meet State Housing Goals by Vi0 on Monday February 12, 2018 @01:11PM (#16360519)
Where in https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm... does it say that?

65917.7.b.4.A and B both impose minimums on the maximum height limit that can be imposed. They do not impose a minimum on the height itself. This bill allows for building higher, it does not force it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:97% of California Cities Failed to Meet State Housing Goals by ebikelaw on Monday February 12, 2018 @01:13PM (#16360550)
I said “minimum height limits” read (minimum)(height limits) i.e. the height limits may not be lower.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:97% of California Cities Failed to Meet State Housing Goals by Vi0 on Monday February 12, 2018 @01:55PM (#16360942)
That wording is a bit confusing. You might think about changing it to be minimums on height limits for better readability.
[ Parent | on HN ]