Re:Hacker News comments are assigned reading for UC Berkeley...
by pknerd on Monday February 12, 2018 @05:36AM
(#16357798)
is it me or others also see that CAPTCHA and "loading" thing on main page?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hacker News comments are assigned reading for UC Berkeley...
by eesmith on Monday February 12, 2018 @06:01AM
(#16357894)
You know there are people who don't like the HN hivemind, yes? "Hacker News is an echo chamber focusing on computer posturing and self-aggrandizement." and "Hacker News is the Slashdot for the smug classes".
For the most part I think they are right, though obviously I am still here. I think that says something about me.
Some of these people do things like do a redirect based on the referer.
Try following one of the links at https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=jwz.org . Done because "Hacker News is a steaming cesspool and I don't have time or desire to deal with their bandwidth demands, so I just block them."
Re:Hacker News comments are assigned reading for UC Berkeley...
by aalleavitch on Monday February 12, 2018 @09:48AM
(#16358864)
It’s weird to call Hacker News a hive mind when all I see is people arguing with each other.
Re:Hacker News comments are assigned reading for UC Berkeley...
by eesmith on Monday February 12, 2018 @01:14PM
(#16360561)
Have you ever watched US political shows? It seems like the inside-the-Beltway hivemind loves to argue with each other too.
Never known people who like to argue with each other for the sake of argument?
Re:Hacker News comments are assigned reading for UC Berkeley...
by sytelus on Monday February 12, 2018 @06:51AM
(#16358080)
Ok... I guess I have to let out the secret. Open in incognito. After reading, you will realize this is purposeful trap to keep "Hacknews" out :).
Re:Hacker News comments are assigned reading for UC Berkeley...
by tempodox on Monday February 12, 2018 @05:51AM
(#16357858)
If you delete the “/_security_check/” part from the URL, you get to the site proper. Maybe it's a reaction to a steep surge in requests.
Edit: Or, as another comment proposes, it could in fact be due to the referrer, and we're being had.