The Fields Medal should return to its roots

Re:The Fields Medal should return to its roots by cc81 on Sunday February 11, 2018 @05:18PM (#16355146)

One argument that some have is that men have a more extreme distribution of IQ and mathematical ability and when it comes to things like the Fields medal it is the few extreme ones that make an impact.

I don't know how well done those studies are though.

EDIT: I doubt it is that big though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Fields Medal should return to its roots by majos on Sunday February 11, 2018 @06:46PM (#16355493)

I used to believe this, but now I think a confounding factor here is that girls are socialized away from extremes in general.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Fields Medal should return to its roots by rimliu on Monday February 12, 2018 @02:30AM (#16357125)

Ok, I can get you can somehow socialize a person to pretend be dumber than they are, but how do you socialize someone away from being dumb? And why does that not work for boys?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Fields Medal should return to its roots by majos on Monday February 12, 2018 @08:27AM (#16358407)

I think poor achool performance is more a function of behavioral issues than "being dumb" -- not because everyone is smart, but because the bar in your average American school is more about following directions than anything else. Boys lagging behind girls in social development is well-documented, right?

And at the Fields medal level it's less about "pretend you're not smart" and more about "we just don't think it's a good idea for you to skip grades".

[ Parent | on HN ]