News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:To Power the Future, Carmakers Flip on 48-Volt Systems by ggm on Saturday February 10, 2018 @08:57PM (#16350737)
This article conflates two things. One: adoption of a 48v standard for powered systems because it's a sweet-spot for efficiency, current draw, systems design. Two: PHEV and the adoption of electric transmission and drive train, which permits a non throttled engine of any form to run at constant high efficiency or not at all and use batteries.

Two things. One story. Cars are becoming like common rail deisel with a unified power model for systems integration and cars are becoming like locomotives which use electric traction for systems efficiency.

Re:To Power the Future, Carmakers Flip on 48-Volt Systems by klodolph on Sunday February 11, 2018 @12:39AM (#16351368)
The 48 V DC "sweet spot" is mostly safety / regulatory. As soon as you get to 50 V, the safety requirements (NEC) change. You can hold on to bare conductors with a 48 V potential across them just fine, even though 120 V AC will kill you and make it hurt the entire time you are dying.

48 V devices can require connections that are inconvenient and large, depending on what you want to power with them. Try running an air conditioner off 48 V and measuring the peak current draw.

https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/267789/how-s...

Re:To Power the Future, Carmakers Flip on 48-Volt Systems by MrBuddyCasino on Sunday February 11, 2018 @03:50AM (#16351825)
> You can hold on to bare conductors with a 48 V potential across them just fine

Even with wet hands? I was under the assumption the unconditionally safe upper limit was around 24V.