Re:To Power the Future, Carmakers Flip on 48-Volt Systems
by twic on Saturday February 10, 2018 @07:40PM
(#16350479)
The specific number of 48V is presumably inherited from telecommunications:
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/10851/why-do...
There's lots of telecom equipment that works at 48V, so it's presumably cheap and easy for carmakers to find suppliers.
Re:To Power the Future, Carmakers Flip on 48-Volt Systems
by GeorgeTirebiter on Saturday February 10, 2018 @11:34PM
(#16351210)
There is practically no overlap between automotive and telecom. When I was at Tesla, we couldn't find even one manufacturer for common use subsystems (e.g. window motors). It's a chicken and egg problem for now. That's why 'everything' is still at 12V.
Re:To Power the Future, Carmakers Flip on 48-Volt Systems
by jaclaz on Sunday February 11, 2018 @04:46AM
(#16351994)
Canot say in the US, but in EU most trucks have (since I can remember) 24 V circuits, so there is anyway a long list of parts at 24 V manufactured.
I couldn't find a succinct explanation in the article why cars would benefit from this spot in between merely sending information (digital levels like 1.8, 2.2, 3.3, 5.0, etc.) and using electricity to do "real" work (120V, 240V, 480V, etc.). As I understand your answer, yes, they'd like to use it for work, but not so much as to stray into the range of orange wires. I got the second part of that from the article, but the first part was very hard to extract from it.