News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meritocracy and its discontents: The merits of revisiting... by mc32 on Saturday February 10, 2018 @12:42AM (#16346070)
For one, they take their wealth and knowledge with them which adds to brain drain and anaemic economy at home.
Re:Meritocracy and its discontents: The merits of revisiting... by Viliam1234 on Saturday February 10, 2018 @08:23AM (#16347194)
But they can't take the oil wells and other natural resources with them.

That's the problem of countries with many natural resources -- they can afford to get rid of their best people.

Re:Meritocracy and its discontents: The merits of revisiting... by Fins on Saturday February 10, 2018 @02:45AM (#16346376)
That would not necessarily concern Putin too much, as the ones with brains almost by definition would not be too happy with him.
Re:Meritocracy and its discontents: The merits of revisiting... by aaron-lebo on Saturday February 10, 2018 @03:16AM (#16346447)
I know you are getting a zinger in, but yesterday's HN darling might be evidence against that:

Many scientists protested, but Elbakyan didn’t understand the outrage. As far as she was concerned, Dynasty — particularly through its funding of the LMF — had spread “propaganda against Putin and the Russian authorities.” She describes Zimin’s work through Dynasty, and the organization itself, as “anti-communist,” though she’s vague about how. Elbakyan says the foundation and Sci-Hub are “ideologically opposed,” and contends that Dynasty is somehow Sci-Hub’s capitalistic foil.

Re:Meritocracy and its discontents: The merits of revisiting... by Fins on Saturday February 10, 2018 @03:46AM (#16346505)
Actually it's exactly evidence for that -- anyone who considers "anti-communist" to be a bad thing, especially so in the ex-USSR, lacks both brains and even a single shred of human decency.

Not that I thought much of her before anyway.