Re:Financial Times journo's private messages quoted to her a...
by gatmne on Friday February 09, 2018 @10:26PM
(#16345687)
If you're in a situation where throwaway-hardware makes sense, you'll care how the throwing-away is actually done.
While not throwaway hardware, the company I work for destroys hard drives and other persistent memory devices before discarding computers. If the persistent memory device cannot be easily and reliably destroyed, the whole device is.
I bet journalists with sensitive information are far more thorough.
Re:Financial Times journo's private messages quoted to her a...
by KaiserPro on Saturday February 10, 2018 @02:01AM
(#16346260)
everything is net booted, with no HDDs (at least that was the plan, it wasnt my project)
destruction is rather fun actually, after wiping, memory/disk is removed and taken apart manually. lots of magnets to play with.
Re:Financial Times journo's private messages quoted to her a...
by tehlike on Saturday February 10, 2018 @10:13AM
(#16347603)
I suspect something that wipes out hardware many times without magnets would still be very safe. Only when it is decommisioned does it make sense to use physics to destroy it fully.
And chances are there are some security researchers who wouldn't mind diverting those devices from the trash...
(My curiosity honestly probably stems from the fact that I'm always on the lookout for unorthodox ways to upgrade my own _very_ old tech)