News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by habosa on Friday February 09, 2018 @11:40AM (#16341621)
So what is Lewandowski's final status here? I know he doesn't work at Uber anymore, but did he keep all the money?

Seems like he got a pretty good deal if so, he's retired with hundreds of millions.

Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by hn_throw_1234 on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:10PM (#16341904)
He made very little off of Uber since his comp was tied to milestones related to Otto's technology
Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by burner890 on Friday February 09, 2018 @07:27PM (#16345020)
The equity he received from Otto's acquisition was also clawed back because he was fired with cause. He ended up with nothing from Uber.
Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by curun1r on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:07PM (#16341883)
He's probably going to be sued by Waymo, likely with Uber's full cooperation. The part of Google's case that always seemed the strongest was their forensic evidence of his misconduct just before he left. He could also be sued by Uber if he lied or omitted anything during the Otto acquisition.
Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by theptip on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:16PM (#16341953)
Waymo already pursued arbitration against Levandowsi, I'm unclear on whether that they can go after him again:

https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/29/waymo-pursued-arbitration-...

Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by dpark on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:21PM (#16342004)
I don't see how it's unclear. You can't go through arbitration and then sue because you want more than arbitration awarded you. The entire point of arbitration is that it's binding and final, specifically to avoid the messy lawsuit process.
Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by theptip on Sunday February 11, 2018 @07:15PM (#16355593)
I'm not sure whether the arbitration covered all of the crimes that Levandowski allegedly committed; from the article,

> “Waymo asserts no claims for trade secret misappropriation in those arbitrations."

That article describes the arbitration being about poaching/non-compete agreement violations.

If they didn't raise the trade secret theft allegations, are they allowed to come back for another try? Or did they miss their opportunity?

Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by dpark on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @12:14PM (#16368761)
Arbitration does not and cannot cover crimes. Arbitration is a civil matter. I would imagine that the arbitration agreement included a clause along the lines of "Alphabet will not pursue any further legal claims against Levandowski related to his time of employment." and vice versa.

I could be wrong, of course, but I doubt arbitration left open a lot of space for future action. Without the arbitration being unsealed, though, I have no way of knowing.

Of course, the US DoJ and/or California equivalents can still pursue criminal charges against Levandowski.

Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by beambot on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:29PM (#16342081)
Probably true. But if he made fraudulent or false statements during arbitration that are later proven as such, I assume that could reopen him to lawsuits
Re:Uber and Waymo Reach Settlement by ggg9990 on Friday February 09, 2018 @11:52AM (#16341728)
He’ll be sued but regardless of what happens he’ll be fantastically wealthy afterwards.