Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by ComodoHacker on Friday February 09, 2018 @01:29AM
(#16338346)
It's surely authenticated, but I don't want guests to use WPA-Enterprise. I just need a way to communicate temporary passwords to them.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by icebraining on Friday February 09, 2018 @02:06AM
(#16338475)
Right, and WPA-Enterprise (which even many cheap home routers support nowadays) is that way - you can just generate temporary logins.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by ComodoHacker on Friday February 09, 2018 @03:40AM
(#16338783)
WPA-Enterprise is a way to authenticate users, not a way to distribute logins/passwords. Am I missing something about it?
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by icebraining on Friday February 09, 2018 @03:42AM
(#16338788)
I guess I misunderstood you before. You're using the portal to provide passwords to the users? How does that work?
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by ComodoHacker on Friday February 09, 2018 @04:11AM
(#16338909)
Portal shows a message like "here's your temporary login/password for 4 hours". Then a user enters them to the login form. When using WPA-Enterprise, a user can also set up WPA on their device with these credentials.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by q3k on Friday February 09, 2018 @06:45AM
(#16339483)
If the portal provides you with the credentials and also asks for them, what's the point of that portal in the first place?
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure”
by ComodoHacker on Friday February 09, 2018 @11:35AM
(#16341571)
You can use them across multiple sessions and devices.
If it's authenticated, you should be using WPA-Enterprise anyway, which supports different logins, and actually isolates the traffic between clients, whereas those "portals" don't, allowing any other user to sniff your traffic.