News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by mpolichette on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:11AM (#16338040)
If you have a web service counterpart you should consider looking into webrtc... the sdp exchange can happen through your site and then they will connect directly
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by aurelian15 on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:18AM (#16338069)
That's a valid point, and something like this might be a solution (i.e. serving the client JS from a public site with valid TLS certificate and connecting to the local network from there) -- however, I don't want my application to be dependent on an internet connection. This is something you should be able to run in the literal lonely cabin in the woods.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by hamandcheese on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:28AM (#16338098)
You could use service workers to aggressively cache the client for offline use. And maybe have an insecure version served from the application as a fallback.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by collinmanderson on Friday February 09, 2018 @08:24AM (#16339966)
I think manually trusting a self-signed is the simplest way to go in that case.