News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Science’s Pirate Queen by tsomctl on Thursday February 08, 2018 @08:55PM (#16337282)
I'm a guy starting my own deep learning startup in my living room. I'm not associated with a university, and I barely make enough money to live off of. There's numerous papers that are relevant to what I'm working on, and at $30 a pop, that adds up quickly. Furthermore, the abstract for a paper is sometimes so vague that you don't know if it is relevant until you read half way through it.

Also, I am diabetic. Pretty much everything in pop science says to eat complex carbs, and avoid fats and simple sugars. There are a number of papers that talk about the benefits of a low carb and high fat diet, but they're behind a paywall.

So it's more than just a small specialist community that consumes scientific literature.

Re:Science’s Pirate Queen by gowld on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:07AM (#16338028)
These are weak examples. AI papers are published on arxiv.org long before they are published in journals (by then they are obsolete)

Diabetic "pop science" says plenty about low-carb high-fat diets, the most famous of which may be Gary Taubes's New York Times article from 2002.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/magazine/what-if-it-s-all-...