Adding fire sprinklers to new construction is an additional expense, yet it's still required as a safety measure.

This argument from cost doesn't seem like a compelling one to me. It's not money being thrown away, it's delivering real added security.

The English government (well, they're the British government, but they don't get to set building rules for the bits of Britain that aren't England) didn't think fire sprinklers were necessary in big tower blocks and schools. Too many regulations you know, it hurts the economy.

Then not just one but two huge tower blocks in London burned down. So how about that, suddenly maybe tower blocks _did_ need sprinklers after all. Shame about all the dead people.

Then use a provider that makes it easy. My point wasn't that it's easy everywhere, just that for simple static sites you can just use a provider that makes it easy for you.