News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by Ajedi32 on Thursday February 08, 2018 @03:53PM (#16335502)
Since the other examples don't appear to have convinced you, how about this one: https://samy.pl/poisontap/

Visit a single HTTP page while that's plugged in and it'll trigger an exploit that siphons all non-secure-flagged cookies off of every popular site that doesn't use HSTS (including the config pages of insecure routers on your LAN), and installs a persistent backdoor in them so the attacker can continue accessing data on those sites even after you're no longer being MITM'd. And that's not even using any zero-days; it's just exploiting the inherent vulnerabilities in non-secure HTTP.

(Note that while the site I linked talks about a USB device the same attack can be carried out by any MITM, like a WiFi router or upstream ISP; it's not exclusive to local attackers.)

Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by tokenizerrr on Thursday February 08, 2018 @03:56PM (#16335531)
Interesting, and point well made. Thanks!
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by gmueckl on Friday February 09, 2018 @12:44AM (#16338157)
Wait. This is a DHCP exploit on steroids. The MITM stuff is just possible because operating systems accept bonkers DHCP replies.
Re:Chrome 68 will mark all HTTP sites as “not secure” by Ajedi32 on Friday February 09, 2018 @09:29AM (#16340369)
Yeah, the DHCP trick is what allows this particular method of conducting MITM via USB.

All the stuff it does _after_ becoming a MITM though are things that any MITM could do, regardless of how they became a MITM in the first place. (ARP spoofing, operating or compromising a Wi-Fi access point, etc.)