News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise and fall of 18F by smacktoward on Thursday February 08, 2018 @10:51AM (#16332894)
Compensation in government jobs is almost always lower than what the same person could make in the private sector.

18F's problem is that the appeal of government work is in benefits other than salary: solid health coverage, a pension, job security. But those are really only of interest if you're planning on staying there long term, and 18F's pitch has always been "take a year or two off from your real job and come work with us." It's the Peace Corps for techies, and nobody joins the Peace Corps for the retirement plan.

Re:The rise and fall of 18F by verst on Thursday February 08, 2018 @11:32AM (#16333340)
You cannot stay at 18F for the long term. These are limited term, 'non-competitive service' positions.

* Job security only for your 2 year term (unless you renew by another 2 for a max of 4 years). After that, you need to leave government service

* Health care coverage was similar to major tech companies in the Bay Area. However, vision / dental benefits were worse.

* Pension benefits only start after 3 years of government service, so most working for 18F will likely not receive these.

But I agree that for other government positions these are good perks.