News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Designing Windows 95’s User Interface by kllrnohj on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @01:35PM (#16326822)
> I wouldn't switch back because of the underlying crap that is the Windows [...] file system

You lost me. HFS+ is arguably one of the worst file systems around (yes I know that Apple finally switched to APFS but that was fairly recent).

I'm really curious what you actually liked about Mac's file system vs. Windows?

Re:Designing Windows 95’s User Interface by russellbeattie on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @03:05PM (#16327542)
Hmmm... You're right of course. I didn't describe that well. I meant Unix file names and way of working with files vs. Windows. In other words, forward slashes, symlinks, mounts, sane permissions, etc. I hate dealing with drive letters, etc. What's a good name for this?
Re:Designing Windows 95’s User Interface by kllrnohj on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @04:42PM (#16328283)
Oh, the UX of the file space layout.

NTFS/Windows actually has all of that stuff you want, too. NTFS's permission system, for example, is extremely feature-full and integrates nicely with the user system (ACL support by default rather than an add-on, for example). The octal user-group-all permission you're probably used to is pretty crude by comparison.

It's more likely just you're unfamiliar with it rather than it's actually missing anything.

But if you want you can just pretend C:\ is equivalent to / and mount all your other drives at C:\mnt\whatever, that's completely doable (with a GUI to configure it if you want, even)

Re:Designing Windows 95’s User Interface by MBCook on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @02:51PM (#16327448)
Agreed. NTFS is one of the few things I missed.

I’m still annoyed that APFS doesn’t have file level checksums.