Pale Moon Official Branding Violation – Issue #86 – Jasperla/openbsd-wip

Re:Pale Moon Official Branding Violation – Issue #86 – Jaspe... by squarefoot on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @09:00AM (#16324401)

"but the behavior in that thread would have had me eject and find something different pretty much immediately."

Ditto. And I speak as a PaleMoon user as it's the browser of choice on all my machines. They could be right on principle, but the OP had no right to act as an ass that way.

(edit: posted by mistake on top thread)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pale Moon Official Branding Violation – Issue #86 – Jaspe... by lsaferite on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @10:31AM (#16325033)

So, the question is, have you followed through on that feeling and dumped PaleMoon as a result? The only way they feel the pain of their behavior is if users leave due to that behavior.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pale Moon Official Branding Violation – Issue #86 – Jaspe... by squarefoot on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @11:57AM (#16325871)

After reading the whole threads both on github and Pale Moon forums, I believe the best option is to migrate everything back to Firefox and dump it. Unless they either sincerely and publicly apologize for being so rude or kick that guy off the project. But I'm not holding my breath for that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pale Moon Official Branding Violation – Issue #86 – Jaspe... by juliangoldsmith on Thursday February 08, 2018 @03:36PM (#16335370)

Unless I'm mistaken, that guy is the head of the project.

I dumped Pale Moon a while ago because it was generally terrible, and have had better luck with Waterfox.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pale Moon Official Branding Violation – Issue #86 – Jaspe... by squarefoot on Sunday February 11, 2018 @11:33AM (#16353322)

Never heard of Waterfox, from the features looks interesting, thanks for mentioning it.

[ Parent | on HN ]