U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by braythwayt on Monday February 05, 2018 @12:58PM (#16310560)

It's generally a bad idea to complain about down-votes. Try to shrug and argue the points, not people's choices for how to respond to the points.

Taking my own advice, regardless of what you or anybody may think of the connection between Russian money, Russian politics, and Mr. Trump, surely we can find a number of wealthy Americans who are interested in winding down Federal oversight.

I'd start with the high-fructose corn syrup people, the private university rip-off people, and the fossil fuel people. If there are also Russian interests, surely they are not "acting alone."

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by zeveb on Monday February 05, 2018 @04:16PM (#16312266)

> surely we can find a number of wealthy Americans who are interested in winding down Federal oversight.

Or non-wealthy Americans interested in winding down Federal over-reach. Really, in a federal republic aren't there quite a lot of things which can safely be left to the several states? Is it necessary to make everything an item for federal concern?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by s73ver_ on Monday February 05, 2018 @04:38PM (#16312462)

Most things already are. But there are many things that do need to be a federal concern, because a state does not exist in a vacuum, nor is it a (metaphorical) island. Things like the environment and pollution, for instance, need to have a federal component. One state may decide to relax environmental protections so that they can encourage factories and jobs. However, that pollution does not limit itself to the people that decided it. People outside that area, in other states that do have environmental regulations, will also be affected.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by zeveb on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @10:53AM (#16317018)

> But there are many things that do need to be a federal concern

I completely agree! Most of them are already explicitly listed as federal concerns, in the Constitution; we should amend it to include environmental concerns for the exact reason you note.

But I see no reason why e.g. education should be a federal concern. Let the states do as they will.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by s73ver_ on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @12:18PM (#16317681)

Because there need to be national standards for education. The citizens of a state do not exist in a vacuum, and being taught Creationism instead of actual science is going to do great harm to those kids ability to get jobs, which is going to have an impact on many sectors of the economy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by dragonwriter on Monday February 05, 2018 @04:20PM (#16312299)

> Really, in a federal republic aren't there quite a lot of things which can safely be left to the several states?

Well, you hope so, otherwise a federal republic is a good idea. OTOH, simply because you have a federal government (or even that it was a good idea a century or two ago) doesn't mean that a federal republic is a good idea, and even if a federal republic is a good idea and there are quite a lot of things that make most sense at the state level, well, that doesn't mean that every particular thing belongs there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:U.S. consumer protection official puts Equifax probe on ice by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Monday February 05, 2018 @01:20PM (#16310737)

Then they should do away with the stupid downvotes. You can't argue points with people who don't actually say anything.

[ Parent | on HN ]