Re:Sprawling Mayan network discovered under Guatemala jungle
by ahi on Friday February 02, 2018 @04:15PM
(#16294243)
Some rudimentary googling, MIT campus is 168 acres or .26 sq miles. So the 810 sq miles in 3 years is still pretty impressive.
Re:Sprawling Mayan network discovered under Guatemala jungle
by mygo on Saturday February 03, 2018 @08:14AM
(#16297483)
MIT also has wifi. And power outlets.
Re:Sprawling Mayan network discovered under Guatemala jungle
by zo1 on Saturday February 03, 2018 @02:57AM
(#16296719)
LIDAR data requires precise location-information of the scanning-device, otherwise the data you collect is at best useless, and at-most wildly skewed. This is because all the points are in-reference to the location of the device. A faster traveling vehicle inherently means less-accurate location measurements.
Re:Sprawling Mayan network discovered under Guatemala jungle
by nitrogen on Saturday February 03, 2018 @04:35PM
(#16299809)
Can SLAM be applied in this case?
Re:Sprawling Mayan network discovered under Guatemala jungle
by zo1 on Sunday February 04, 2018 @04:28AM
(#16302043)
It definitely can, though accuracy would always be a big concern.
IIRC, the Google self-driving car used LIDAR. Though their localization algorithms included many sensors, with the LIDAR data was just one of them.
My ignorance on the subject of LIDAR has me wondering why we can't use a faster traveling vehicle, or would it be possible to do perform scans with something like a fleet of balloons that stream the data back vs one static device.