Re:Ikea founder leaves fortune to no one, structures it to e...
by JoeAltmaier on Friday February 02, 2018 @12:39PM
(#16292384)
You get it; pedantry is pointless here. The folks benefitting from a thing will vote themselves money and perks until the place is bankrupt. It takes a different mindset to sign the front of the check, than to sign the back of the check.
Re:Ikea founder leaves fortune to no one, structures it to e...
by bomb199 on Friday February 02, 2018 @12:51PM
(#16292503)
>The folks benefitting from a thing will vote themselves money and perks until the place is bankrupt
So, executive boards of companies?
Re:Ikea founder leaves fortune to no one, structures it to e...
by pessimizer on Friday February 02, 2018 @02:04PM
(#16293271)
Exactly. I tend to criticize plans like this because of their essential similarities to current arrangements, not their differences.
The positive aspect is that it introduces democracy into the system (through control by officeholders), if only for the moment that it takes for power to recentralize (as any autonomy that the business has is lost due to patronage appointments from the central government or larger unions.) Maybe this could be prevented by handing control to the union of the workers in a particular company, or a particular location, rather than large unions that cover entire industries.
I'm not interested in debating the merits or lack thereof of socialism as a system of government, but the "bread and circuses" thing applied to Roman citizens.
Unless I was misinformed, the overlap between the people in the Roman empire who were citizens and the people in the Roman empire who were the labour force was very, very small.